Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
What is the difference between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 1436 | 3DMark Time Spy | 592 |
| 690 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 233 |
| 4039 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 1526 |
| 2058 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 767 |
| 1110 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 419 |
| 10621 | 3DMark Wild Life | 3562 |
| 3513 | 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1204 |
| 12815 | 3DMark Night Raid | 5691 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Tiger Lake GT2 | GPU Name | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Generation 12.1 | Architecture | Generation 9.5 |
| Intel | Foundry | Intel |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm++ |
| unknown | Transistors | unknown |
| 146 mm² | Die Size | unknown |
Graphics Card
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Iris Xe Graphics-M (Tiger Lake) | Family | HD Graphics-M (Kaby Lake) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| Ring Bus | Bus Interface | Ring Bus |
Memory
| System Shared | Memory Size | System Shared |
| System Shared | Memory Type | System Shared |
| System Shared | Memory Bus | System Shared |
| System Dependent | Bandwidth | System Dependent |
Performance
| 26.40 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 6.600 GPixel/s |
| 52.80 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 52.80 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS (2:1) | FP16 (half) performance | 1.690 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| 1.690 TFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| 422.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | FP64 (double) performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Clock Speeds
| 300 MHz | Base Clock | 300 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock | 1100 MHz |
| System Shared | Memory Clock | System Shared |
Render Config
| 768 | Shading Units | 384 |
| 48 | TMUs | 48 |
| 24 | ROPs | 6 |
Board Design
| IGP | Slot Width | IGP |
| 15 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (12_1) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.2 |
| 6.4 | Shader Model | 6.4 |