Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
What is the difference between Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and NVIDIA Quadro M2000M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 1377 | 3DMark Time Spy | 1313 |
| 617 | 3DMark Time Spy Extreme | 623 |
| 3811 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 3926 |
| 1870 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 1932 |
| 956 | 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra | 969 |
| 9534 | 3DMark Wild Life | 8213 |
| 12038 | 3DMark Night Raid | 13695 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| Tiger Lake GT2 | GPU Name | GM107 |
| Generation 12.1 | Architecture | Maxwell |
| Intel | Foundry | TSMC |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| unknown | Transistors | 1,870 million |
| 146 mm² | Die Size | 148 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2015 |
| Iris Xe Graphics-M (Tiger Lake) | Family | Quadro Mobile (Mx000M) |
| Active | Production | Active |
| Ring Bus | Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory
| System Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| System Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| System Shared | Memory Bus | 128 bit |
| System Dependent | Bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s |
Performance
| 22.00 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 17.57 GPixel/s |
| 44.00 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 43.92 GTexel/s |
| 1,408 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,405 GFLOPS |
| 352.0 GFLOPS (1:4) | FP64 (double) performance | 43.92 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 300 MHz | Base Clock | 1029 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock | 1098 MHz |
| System Shared | Memory Clock | 1253 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
Render Config
| 640 | Shading Units | 640 |
| 40 | TMUs | 40 |
| 20 | ROPs | 16 |
| 1024 KB | L2 Cache | 2 MB |
Board Design
| IGP | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 15 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 55 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (12_1) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.2 | Vulkan | 1.1 |
| 6.4 | Shader Model | 5.1 |