NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
What is the difference between NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M. Find out which graphics card has better performance.
Benchmarks
| 567 | 3DMark Time Spy | 1101 |
| 1910 | 3DMark Fire Strike | 3398 |
| 951 | 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme | 1697 |
| 3942 | 3DMark Wild Life | 7219 |
| 6816 | 3DMark Night Raid | 11805 |
Graphics Processor (GPU)
| GK104 | GPU Name | GM107 |
| N14E-Q1-A2 | Model number | N16P-Q1-A2 |
| Kepler | Architecture | Maxwell |
| TSMC | Foundry | TSMC |
| 28 nm | Process Size | 28 nm |
| 3,540 million | Transistors | 1,870 million |
| 294 mm² | Die Size | 148 mm² |
Graphics Card
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2015 |
| Quadro Mobile (Kx000M) | Family | Quadro Mobile (Mx000M) |
| End-of-life | Production | Active |
| MXM-B (3.0) | Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256 bit | Memory Bus | 128 bit |
| 89.60 GB/s | Bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s |
Performance
| 7.848 GPixel/s | Pixel fillrate | 15.89 GPixel/s |
| 31.39 GTexel/s | Texture fillrate | 31.78 GTexel/s |
| 753.4 GFLOPS | FP32 (float) performance | 1,017 GFLOPS |
| 31.39 GFLOPS (1:24) | FP64 (double) performance | 31.78 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Clock Speeds
| 700 MHz 2.8 Gbps effective | Memory Clock | 1253 MHz 5 Gbps effective |
| 654 MHz | GPU Clock | 993 MHz |
Render Config
| 576 | Shading Units | 512 |
| 48 | TMUs | 32 |
| 32 | ROPs | 16 |
| 16 KB (per SMX) | L1 Cache | 64 KB (per SMM) |
| 512 KB | L2 Cache | 2 MB |
Board Design
| MXM Module | Slot Width | MXM Module |
| 75 W | Thermal design power (TDP) | 40 W |
| No outputs | Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
| 12 (11_0) | DirectX | 12 (11_0) |
| 4.6 | OpenGL | 4.6 |
| 3.0 | OpenCL | 3.0 |
| 1.1 | Vulkan | 1.1 |
| 5.1 | Shader Model | 5.1 |
| 3.0 | CUDA | 5.0 |